Loss Posted July 11, 2013 Report Share Posted July 11, 2013 Talk about it here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Loss Posted September 4, 2013 Author Report Share Posted September 4, 2013 Recap of the Goldust/Brian Pillman feud with Pillman saying Dakota is his love child and the Ground Zero stipulation that Terri Runnels will have to spend 30 days with Pillman if Goldust loses at Ground Zero, while Pillman will leave the WWF. This wraps up with Sunny interviewing Brian Pillman. Pillman makes all sorts of sexual innuendo and shows us a French maid's outfit he plans on her wearing. I hated this feud and stipulation, because no one would ever agree to that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kevin Ridge Posted September 22, 2013 Report Share Posted September 22, 2013 Yeah, dumb for Goldust to agree to such a stipulation with putting his wife up. Who the hell would go along with that? And then there’s the point if Marlena even has a say in this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zenjo Posted October 27, 2013 Report Share Posted October 27, 2013 Goldust is crazy, and wrestling storylines aren't always logical. So let's go along with it for now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soup23 Posted February 12, 2014 Report Share Posted February 12, 2014 Pillman cuts a great promo letting the sexual terms linger just long enough that they all resonate. Feud is kind of stupid on premise but good mid card stuff to me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dooley Posted February 13, 2014 Report Share Posted February 13, 2014 The idea is that Goldust wants Pillman gone so desperately and is so sure he'll win that he doesn't think about the consequences. No worse than the other dozen variations on this angle. And Pillman cutting promos is always a good thing, even if he was physically done. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El-P Posted February 13, 2014 Report Share Posted February 13, 2014 They should have gone shooty a bit on this one, playing up on the fact Terri used to date Pillman for a while before she met Dustin. If you believe Terri's shoot interview, the pay-off would have been awesome, with Dustin and Terri renewing their vows in a wedding ceremony, only to have Marlena betray Goldust and go back with Pillman, complete with a beatdown and Terri's wedding gown sprayed with blood. Damn, I would have loved this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JaymeFuture Posted May 28, 2014 Report Share Posted May 28, 2014 If I recall, it was Marlena who accepted the challenge, and it was going to end up, like the poster said above, with Marlena double-crossing Goldust in the end so it would have made as much "wrestling sense" as much as something like this can. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PeteF3 Posted December 23, 2015 Report Share Posted December 23, 2015 Yeah, they did take care to have Marlena be the one to accept the stip, IIRC over Goldust's objections. Pillman cuts an innuendo-laden promo, that's actually about as racy as any Val Venis promo, since it's almost insulting to refer to these blunt-as-a-sledgehammer puns as "innuendo." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Exposer Posted May 25, 2017 Report Share Posted May 25, 2017 The first obvious Russo feud is here. This is absurd. Pillman tells Goldust Dakota is his love child. Jesus Christ. If Pillman wins at Ground Zero, Marlena has to be with him for 30 days. If he loses, he'll leave the WWF forever. The video is all serious with Dustin sharing his thoughts saying how much he loves his family. Dramatic music plays as the narrator goes on about the possibility of a child being separated from their mother. I'm torn on using children in angles. I like the Raven-Sandman feud, but this seems much worse. Pillman's interview is funny though with lots of good sexual innuendos & Sunny has great facial expressions in response. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.