JerryvonKramer Posted October 13, 2014 Report Share Posted October 13, 2014 If you ever compare Dick Murdoch to Kane again, I will fucking ban you. Pete, don't tell him about the time I compared Jerry Lawler to Baron Mikel Scicluna. Shakespeare (v.): The lost art of pretending to have a foreign object that the wrestler "hides" on himself and keeps out of sight from the referee, which is "used" to inflect damage on his opponent when in fact there is no object. It was used decades ago to draw crowd heat [dfn.] and keep the referee busy, but it is rarely used today. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kjh Posted October 14, 2014 Report Share Posted October 14, 2014 I'm not sure Kane is a fair comparison, as he wasn't a consistent house show main eventer throughout his WWE run, nor was he ever a top tier worker. Probably the closest comparison would be Randy Orton, although he was a bigger star at his peak, but wasn't as good a worker. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.