Jump to content
Pro Wrestling Only

Comments that don't warrant a thread - Part 4


TravJ1979

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 6.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Funny, I've been thinking about the first point about athletics/strenght feats a lot lately the same way he does, meaning that pro-wrestling has never been more *real* than it is today, while at the same time never been so unrealistic. And that pro-wrestling becoming more real (which can be traced back to the garbage/hardcore scene and to a lesser extent to one japanese way of working really stiff) goes along with the fact it can't be *perceived as real* anymore because despite the suspension of disbelief, there's no real heat today (in Mexico maybe) and people really are onto the joke and really playing along. Even in NXT for instance, no one actually really hates Ciampa, everyone is very aware of their respective role in the broader sense, the audience is now playing along. Which wasn't the case at first, as the "smart" crowds were more inclined on shitting on babyfaces and chant "you fucked up" rather than playing the role they were supposed to play in a context when they couldn't *be* that role anymore.

 

So, the more real the athletic prowess gets, the more genuine the reactions are too, because no matter what we can say about some of those insane flippy sequences some of us hates so much, it is indeed incredible feats of athleticism you don't see anywhere else. That's why in a way, I find the idea of a "good wrestling crowd" being the one who plays along (cheers the babyfaces, boo the heels) kinda odd because it's not the most genuine wrestling crowd. In a way it's even more post-modern than the indy crowd who genuinely goes insane for crazy spotty shit. I'm not sure if working yourself up to the point you actually believe (or make-believe) you hate Ciampa is better than actually going insane for one of Ospreay vs Ricochet ridiculous-SFX looking sequence. There's something almost retromaniac about pretending you really hate a pro-wrestler in 2018.

 

So, pro-wrestling as figure skating anyone ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even in NXT for instance, no one actually really hates Ciampa, everyone is very aware of their respective role in the broader sense, the audience is now playing along.

 

How do you figure? Nobody's going to pull a gun on him in the parking lot or anything like that, but the fans seem to be genuinely invested in seeing his character get his comeuppance. It's not like he's Elias and they're booing because it's fun to play along.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

but the fans seem to be genuinely invested in seeing his character get his comeuppance.

 

That kind of wording says it all actually. ;)

 

NXT is a "smarter" crowd than your average WWE crowd. They "invest in genuine, classic heel-face dynamic".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What exactly is your point? That we should want fans to be too stupid or emotional to separate fantasy and reality?

 

I'm not wanting anything out of pro-wrestling crowds. But there's something interesting to me about the fact that what is *real* about pro-wrestling today is what resonnates with a particular kind of crowd, whose enjoyment and reactions can't be based on a predetermined role that they are supposed to fill simply because thet react mostly to that *real* element of modern pro-wrestling (as opposed to "investing emotions on a character"). A crowd that is mostly derired (including on this board) because they are a "bad crowd who only pop for spots and don't cheer babyfaces and boo heels". I don't pass judgement on either of them (and really, my particular taste in atmosphere makes me enjoy a boo-heel/cheer-faces crowd a lot more).

 

As far as "being too stupid or emotional", there's a can of worms to be opened there actually, going back to the "good old days" and the "southern territories" which were supposed to get the most heat. What consisted of the pro-wrestling crowds then, depending on the territories ? Was there a conscious notion that you would manipulate less educated people to get the most genuine reactions ? Why would the NY audience be considered "smarter" than say, the Tennessee one ? There's a class disdain issue buried somewhere… Also, were the genuine crowds of the 80's better because they woud chant "faggots" at effeminate workers, or chear Magnum TA when he would sexually assault Baby Doll and she would "like it !!!!!!!" ? Anyway, tons of questions there...

 

 

I like it when Jerome gets his comeuppance.

 

I don't sell shit. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are some things I try not to complain about publicly for fear of being no fun. But I really really hate when people say "wrassling" or any variation there of. I can agree with everything else being said, see that and sour.

 

You must hate my posts then. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It bugs me a lot because it was coined to demean poor wrestling fans and the business in general. Look up how the term was created.

I feel like fans using that and "Fake Fighting" is just asinine. Some fans are so scared to admit they like wrestling so they have to demean wrestling, so we know they don't really like it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

So im slowly plowing through WWF in 2001 watching the weekly TV and PPV but now ive hit a roadblock because the last show I saw was Mania.

 

At the time I hated the Austin heel turn and still do now as im sure alot of others just wished McMahon had gotten stunnered at Mania. So do I bite my tongue and force myself to continue watching or do I just say screw it and go for a different year?

 

I say skip ahead and watch the month of Jericho and Benoit vs. Austin.

 

 

Ive decided to grudgingly go through it, not too impressed whats been going on Austin/Hunter getting the upper hand on every single TV taping and still go over on the PPV.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is it known what the plans for the Brain Busters were going to be in the WWF, post November of '89? They taped the split from Heenan before they knew Tully was gonna be fired and there are a couple episodes of Prime Time where Monsoon and Piper talk about them positively, so I'm wondering if they were supposed to stay and be babyfaces, or if they were always going to leave regardless.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...