Jump to content


Photo

"Macho Madness: The Randy Savage Ultimate Collection"


  • Please log in to reply
209 replies to this topic

#201 flyonthewall2983

flyonthewall2983
  • Members
  • 2854 posts

Posted 18 August 2014 - 05:05 PM

That's what I was thinking. 



#202 Grimmas

Grimmas

    a Wrestling Feminist

  • Members
  • 8300 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Posted 10 September 2014 - 05:24 AM

In this week's WON, Dave was again in "Nothing else makes sense" mode... though in both issues copped out of putting in "published" writing what he seems to think is the reason. It really comes across as a cop out. John

Nothing else makes sense is not really a proof, because it's impossible to know every scenario possible to eliminate them.



#203 flyonthewall2983

flyonthewall2983
  • Members
  • 2854 posts

Posted 27 November 2014 - 07:48 PM

The new doc is pretty good. Only disappointment is that Vince wasn't interviewed or that some more of his big feuds weren't touched upon. 



#204 iamthedoctor

iamthedoctor
  • Members
  • 1152 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:UK

Posted 18 December 2014 - 11:57 AM

The new doc is pretty good. Only disappointment is that Vince wasn't interviewed or that some more of his big feuds weren't touched upon. 

 

Lanny didnt want Michaels or Vince on the DVD for some reason according to his radio interview and kinda wished Patterson hadent taken part.



#205 Petey

Petey
  • Members
  • 242 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Long Island, New York

Posted 01 January 2015 - 10:51 AM

Why not Shawn?



#206 flyonthewall2983

flyonthewall2983
  • Members
  • 2854 posts

Posted 02 January 2015 - 01:32 PM

Maybe he was against a program with Randy as much as Vince was?



#207 Sidebottom

Sidebottom
  • Members
  • 1121 posts

Posted 07 January 2015 - 02:49 PM

Maybe he was against a program with Randy as much as Vince was?

 

God knows, but I doubt this. A feud with Randy would have been huge for Shawn in 1993. Imagine Michaels vs Savage at Mania that year instead of Tatanka. 



#208 flyonthewall2983

flyonthewall2983
  • Members
  • 2854 posts

Posted 07 January 2015 - 07:06 PM

In '93 yeah, but my impression from the doc is that he left shortly after he told Vince about this plan and was rejected, which would have been when Shawn was slowly gaining power and the Kliq was becoming more of a thing backstage.



#209 Johnny Sorrow

Johnny Sorrow
  • Members
  • 4765 posts

Posted 07 January 2015 - 10:17 PM

I have no idea what Shawn was thinking, but from every interview I've heard with Nash and Hall they really liked Savage.
And man, that new doc is heartbreaking.

#210 iamthedoctor

iamthedoctor
  • Members
  • 1152 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:UK

Posted 08 January 2015 - 01:46 PM

In '93 yeah, but my impression from the doc is that he left shortly after he told Vince about this plan and was rejected, which would have been when Shawn was slowly gaining power and the Kliq was becoming more of a thing backstage.

 

I dont see why Vince was so against it. Yeah they said the new generation but so what you mean to tell me that a great champion from the old generation battles a top guy from the new generation do battle at 10 years of mania and Shawn wins?

 

Whats so bad with that? I suppose they forget people that like Bret, Slaughter had been in the WWF a decade previously by 94 ish.

 

I enjoyed the feud on the UK circuit ie the London & Germany matches.






0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users