Jump to content
Pro Wrestling Only

Dave Meltzer stuff


Loss

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 9.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Did those UK PPVs precede tours altogether? I remember the first WWE house show I went to was a tour connected to one of those UK PPVs (Rebellion I think). I got the impression that it just made more sense on a number of levels for them to do Raw and Smackdown from London or wherever rather than trying to get over and back so quickly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Loss was talking about these UK-only PPVs like One Night Only or Insurrextion, not world-wide PPVs. In the network era there are no real PPVs anyway (at least outside the US, in the US I suppose the shows are still available on some cable providers even though the official internet page of the Survivor Series 2017 does not even mention it), so the most they could do nowadays is running network specials from the UK which they actually did this year.

Regarding them doing European tours before: I don't think that the WWF would have survived the mid 90ies without running lots of tours (like 6-8 a year; sometimes on German TV they were plugging two tours in parallel) in Europe during that time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dave Meltzer is now on Twitter arguing Kenny Omega sells more tickets than John Cena.

 

No, he's not.

 

He's arguing Omega moves a higher percentage of tickets per show than Cena. Apparently when Omega was added to RoH shows this year, they were able to sell more tickets than usual.

 

He's not pretending Omega brings indy shows up to WWE-crowd levels.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's also arguing that if John Cena was booked for Ring of Honor it wouldn't sell as many extra tickets as Kenny Omega, so it's not just 'proportionately in their respective companies'.

 

Omega might have moved more tickets proportionately for those RoH shows but he's wrestled for RoH only two weeks in the last three years? Obviously something in such rare supply is going to sell quicker than something readily available. It doesn't necessarily mean the demand for it is that high.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On what planet do proportional increases matter when the companies are nowhere near the same size? If a company draws 5 people, then brings me in to headline and 10 people show up, am I a bigger difference maker than John Cena? It's a completely useless thing to even talk about unless you're comparing oranges to oranges.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was in response to someone knocking Omega and as with most Dave Twitter arguments, has evolved into something else with both sides being pedantic about wording.

 

He said Omega was the biggest ticket mover in the US.

 

Is he right? Numbers-wise, it would be impossible since RoH isn't selling at WWE's level. But if he adds hundreds of tickets to a group that regularly sells 1000 or less, that's kind of a big deal.

 

Whether he sells more than Cena (he doesn't), it's still impressive and worth noting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was in response to someone knocking Omega and as with most Dave Twitter arguments, has evolved into something else with both sides being pedantic about wording.

 

He said Omega was the biggest ticket mover in the US.

 

Is he right? Numbers-wise, it would be impossible since RoH isn't selling at WWE's level. But if he adds hundreds of tickets to a group that regularly sells 1000 or less, that's kind of a big deal.

 

Whether he sells more than Cena (he doesn't), it's still impressive and worth noting.

 

That's the kind of crazy open-mindedness and flexibility of logic that lets people actually give Buddy Rose the credit he deserves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's also kind of annoying how a lot of the people coming at Dave automatically dismiss anyone and anything not WWE, several times they've come at him that wrestler X or Y can't be a star in wrestling because they've never had at WWE run which is ridiculous.

Part of Dave's twitter bit is QT-ing and snarkily responding to the dumbest of his replies so there's more than a little confirmation bias in there.

 

This is a weird hill for Dave to try to die on but again, that's part of his twitter persona.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

It's also kind of annoying how a lot of the people coming at Dave automatically dismiss anyone and anything not WWE, several times they've come at him that wrestler X or Y can't be a star in wrestling because they've never had at WWE run which is ridiculous.

 

Part of Dave's twitter bit is QT-ing and snarkily responding to the dumbest of his replies so there's more than a little confirmation bias in there.

 

This is a weird hill for Dave to try to die on but again, that's part of his twitter persona.

If he's quote tweeting and snarking to the most stupid of people in his mentions and isn't coming across as being particularly smarter, what does that say?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pretty disappointed in Dave on Twitter today. I and other people I know have talked about how cool it is that Kenny Omega and other people, like Penta, on the independent wrestling scene have been impressive as of late, without doing eyerolling comparisons to John Cena or making up a Jeff Hardy ROH run that never happened. Just embarrassing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...