I'm really baffled by the tag teams. Firstly, am I comparing their credentials against other tag teams or against all other candidates? If it's the latter, I'm not sure how anyone could argue for, eg, the Rockers when they pretty much headlined one AWA 'supershow' and a brief run of C shows where cripped Andre vs Warrior was the real main event.
Secondly, am I taking into account just their tag run or their individual careers as well? If it's the former, as appears to be the case, I don't see how a UK team gets in because hardly anyone in the TV era was full-time in a tag team. You had regular pairings, but they'd always be doing singles matches as well, and not in a "one half of each team faces off sense."
Also, if your singles matches don't affect your tag run, then by the same logic, should tag matches be taken into account for a singles candidate? Because if you take out the matches with Kernodle against Steamboat and Youngblood, Slaughter's case is much weaker.
And how strictly do you enforce the logic. Clearly nobody's going to pay much attention to Jannetty's singles careers in assessing the Rockers. But are people really going to ignore every Taue singles match in assessing the drawing/work/influence of Kawada & Taue. And do you take into account six man matches where the unit of "Kawada & Taue" was part of the team?