yesdanielbryan

I'm rewatching every Danielson's match available. I want to make a critic to Bryan's selling. Watching his match against Naomichi Marufuji (ROH A New Level 2008), it seemed that even in the final minutes he did not give signs of tirediness. I have the sensation that he didn't sell anything. This is the critic to him in the period 2001-2010. So I don't think that about selling he is not one of the best of all time, IMO he is below wrestlers like Benoit, Eddie Guerrero, Kobashi, Misawa, Kawada, Okada, Omega who are among the best sellers of all time, but I think that he also worse at selling than wrestlers like Akiyama, Christopher Daniels, Taue. After that he is very improved in selling, I think that in AEW he is one of the best of all time, but I can't say the same for the period 2001-2010. What do you think about that? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EFQGbGVKvKE (link Danielson vs Marufuji ROH A New Level 2008)

Meltzer about the comparison Danielson vs Kota Ibushi stated: "Today Danielson and it isn't even close. For a career Ibushi, and it also isn't even close." So he said that Ibushi has been way better than Danielson considering entire career? How would you comment that?

Considering that we are in november, who is/are the MVP/best wrestler/s in the world in 2021? Who is the wrestler that produced more than anybody great matches? Thank you very much

Who is the better in ring performer? Who is more versatile, better at selling, storytelling, in ring psychology?

To analyze these comparisons I'd like to talk about Jericho. He is winning 20-5. Why did you choose him over Goldberg?In the sense, Goldberg is for sure a bigger star than Jericho. Jericho in WWE was always a midcarder-uppercarder, occasionally a mani eventer, while Goldberg has been, for his entire short career, and he's still today a main eventer and in 1998 was a mega star. I think that Jericho's greatness has increased so mich these last 2 years with this NJPW and AEW stints.

Good morning. This poll is about historical importance, obiouvsly not about who is a better worker. The comparisons are: 1) Bret Hart vs The Rock 2) Jushin Liger vs The Undertaker 3) Chris Jericho vs Goldberg 4) Junkyard Dog vs Kevin Nash 5) Daniel Bryan vs AJ Styles Thank you very much

Good morning. This poll is about historical importance, obiouvsly not about who is a better worker. The comparisons are: 1) Kurt Angle vs Chris Jericho 2) The Undertaker vs Bret Hart 3) Hiroshi Tanahashi vs Kenta Kobashi 4) Daniel Bryan vs Big Show 5) AJ Styles vs Scott Hall Thank you very much

Hi guys, I returned opening the comparisons about who is a better in ring performer? The criteria are storytelling, in ring psychologhy, selling, quality of matches, workrate, cleaning in the execution of moves. The comparisons are: Bret Hart vs Ric Flair Kazuchika Okada vs Toshiaki Kawada Mitsuharu Misawa vs Kenta Kobashi Bryan Danielson vs Jumbo Tsuruta Hiroshi Tanahashi vs Akira Taue Thank you very much

I'm sorry JerryvonKramer, however, in the poll you voted the opposite wrestlers that you've chosen here.

Good morning. This poll is about historical importance, obiouvsly not about who is a better worker. The comparisons are: 1)Randy Savage vs Mitsuharu Misawa 2)Ultimate Warrior vs Chris Jericho 3)Jake Roberts vs Kurt Angle 4)Akira Taue vs Jeff Hardy 5)Edge vs Rick Rude Thank you very much

In every forum I compared Bryan to Edge he won by a wide margin, even on wrestlingclassics.

On Wrestlingclassics forum I opened a same poll. These are the results: Gus Sonnenberg vs Tom Jenkins 5-3 Bret Hart vs Roddy Piper 6-18 Andre the Giant vs Giant Baba 19-5 Toshiaki Kawada vs Chris Jericho 10-13 Hiroshi Tanahashi vs Kensuke Sasaki 12-5 Jushin Liger vs Kenta Kobashi 16-4 Mitsuharu Misawa vs Goldberg 23-3 Jake Roberts vs Eddie Guerrero 11-9 Daniel Bryan vs Lex Luger 24-2 CM Punk vs Masahiro Chono 12-11

Thanks. About Bryan what is your position? In the sense, what do you think about Coffey's statement about the fact that Bryan's historical importance is a little overrated? If the answer was only about historical importance, without positivity, how would have you compared Bryan, for example, to Edge, Big Show, Randy Orton, AJ Styles, wrestlers that are probably more well known by people (if you analyze google trends data Bryan is very weak) , considering that they have more longeivity and they were on top during more popular periods, but for sure they didn't inspire so many wrestlers like Bryan did and more importantly for sure his style has been more influential.

If there would have not been the term "in a positive way" how would have you voted alla the comparisons? In the sense, would have you vote base on popularity and being more well known ? In the sense, probably considering these comparisons Jericho, Batista, Edge and Show are for sure more well known but does that mean that they are more important, without considering positivity and negativity way? About Jericho vs Kawada, what inducted you in voting for Jericho?

What is also your opinion about Jericho vs Kawada and AJ vs Big Show? Especially about Styles vs Show, did you vote for Big Show, in particular because AJ's career is still in progress like in the case of Bryan?