Jump to content
Pro Wrestling Only

Reviving a dead horse: Reexamining the WrestleMania III attendance debate


Bix

Recommended Posts

On and off, I spent the last few months going over newspaper clippings, old newsletters, & archived web pages as well as sending emails, making calls, and filing public record requests to try to determine the actual attendance in the Pontiac Silverdome at WrestleMania III. My latest article at Deadspin is the result of that research: https://deadspin.com/how-many-people-were-actually-at-wrestlemania-iii-a-de-1824178481

 

Loss said I could use this as a conversation starter, so let's do that: In light of the newspaper reports, Steve Harms' comments, weird Observer discrepancies/coincidences, and everything else, what does everyone think the number was? 93,173? 78,500? 88,000? Nothing resembling any of the above? Tamalie from Wrestling Classics attempted a head count of the floor seats in the high resolution photo and came up with roughly 6,300, so almost 87,000 fans if the official Silverdome football capacity was a shoot or a football capacity in the ~72,000 range if it was a work.

 

Thoughts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 57
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

The WM III crowd has always been a fascinating case study in how people will believe what they are told over and over, despite there being actual factual proof of the correct information.

 

I mean, clearly the 93 number is bullshit. 78 is probably the paid attendance. With comps, there were probably 80-84 in the building. That seems to be right about where most people estimate it as well. Yet people will still defend the inflated number with a religious fervor.

 

All just because the WWF has to set the fake attendance records for all the venues it goes to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, no, the point is that Meltzer and others insist that 78K is the actual attendance, not just paid attendance. Which doesn't pass the eye test unless someone can provide some compelling evidence that the Silverdome's 80,311-seat capacity is a work.

 

To my knowledge, the WWF never, ever claimed that 93K was paid attendance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Supposedly on September 18, 1987 for Mass with Pope John Paul II the attendance was over 90,000 as well not long after Wrestlemania 3 according to this Detroit Free Press article too. https://www.freep.com/story/sports/nfl/lions/2015/10/29/pontiac-silverdome-memories/74835284/ I don't see any reason for those numbers to have been inflated, so it looks like it's surely possible for that many people to be in the Silverdome. If the number is inflated, I don't think it's inflated much. Maybe to get it over the 90,000 mark if it was close, say if it was in the 89,000 range. They might not have all been 'paid', but they were still there. Still doing some research, not sure if I want to give this place my card info to sign up for a free trial, but the parts of this article you can read show the attendance for the Pope was less than expected. https://www.newspapers.com/newspage/99914238/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In addition to the regular stadium seats at 80K there are 24 sections that appear to be about 15x25 people each on the floor not counting the ringside "triangles" for lack of an exact shape. That's 375 per section times 24, so 9000 people. The four ringside sections look like at least 750 people each, so another 3K. 80 plus 9 plus 3 is 92K so it's going to take a lot of convincing to me that it wasn't really close to 93K people in that place unless the Lions worked their maximum attendance and take away from the starting number. There is no chance there is only 78K unless a quarter of the stadium bowl is empty or tarped off somewhere. Super Bowl XVI there listed an attendance of 81,270 for reference in 1982, which given my estimate of 12K on the floor, is 93,270 (97 people above what WWF claimed).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Supposedly on September 18, 1987 for Mass with Pope John Paul II the attendance was over 90,000 as well not long after Wrestlemania 3 according to this Detroit Free Press article too. https://www.freep.com/story/sports/nfl/lions/2015/10/29/pontiac-silverdome-memories/74835284/ I don't see any reason for those numbers to have been inflated, so it looks like it's surely possible for that many people to be in the Silverdome. If the number is inflated, I don't think it's inflated much. Maybe to get it over the 90,000 mark if it was close, say if it was in the 89,000 range. They might not have all been 'paid', but they were still there. Still doing some research, not sure if I want to give this place my card info to sign up for a free trial, but the parts of this article you can read show the attendance for the Pope was less than expected. https://www.newspapers.com/newspage/99914238/

There are numerous Newspapers.com clippings linked in my article that you don't need a membership to read, FWIW.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Supposedly on September 18, 1987 for Mass with Pope John Paul II the attendance was over 90,000 as well not long after Wrestlemania 3 according to this Detroit Free Press article too. https://www.freep.com/story/sports/nfl/lions/2015/10/29/pontiac-silverdome-memories/74835284/ I don't see any reason for those numbers to have been inflated, so it looks like it's surely possible for that many people to be in the Silverdome. If the number is inflated, I don't think it's inflated much. Maybe to get it over the 90,000 mark if it was close, say if it was in the 89,000 range. They might not have all been 'paid', but they were still there. Still doing some research, not sure if I want to give this place my card info to sign up for a free trial, but the parts of this article you can read show the attendance for the Pope was less than expected. https://www.newspapers.com/newspage/99914238/

There are numerous Newspapers.com clippings linked in my article that you don't need a membership to read, FWIW.

I was clicking on the links and reading as I was typing lol but I was also trying to find anywhere else that might have numbers. Too bad no one has a seating chart from back then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Supposedly on September 18, 1987 for Mass with Pope John Paul II the attendance was over 90,000 as well not long after Wrestlemania 3 according to this Detroit Free Press article too. https://www.freep.com/story/sports/nfl/lions/2015/10/29/pontiac-silverdome-memories/74835284/ I don't see any reason for those numbers to have been inflated, so it looks like it's surely possible for that many people to be in the Silverdome. If the number is inflated, I don't think it's inflated much. Maybe to get it over the 90,000 mark if it was close, say if it was in the 89,000 range. They might not have all been 'paid', but they were still there. Still doing some research, not sure if I want to give this place my card info to sign up for a free trial, but the parts of this article you can read show the attendance for the Pope was less than expected. https://www.newspapers.com/newspage/99914238/

Do we know for sure that the Pope wouldnt work his numbers?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

this was so papered that as 72,000 drawing card only drew 1.5 million usd adjust for inflation around 4.5 Mlioon this did not i compre this the inoki retirement show that drew 8.5 mliioon gate at the time and around 12.25 adjusted for inflation

 

if ot ud draw 92,000 that gate is even more of an embasstsament since that means as show that drew almost 30 k less fans drew 3x the gate lol the inoki show is officially the 5th biggest gate in the History of wrestling only topped by four mainas III not included

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Supposedly on September 18, 1987 for Mass with Pope John Paul II the attendance was over 90,000 as well not long after Wrestlemania 3 according to this Detroit Free Press article too. https://www.freep.com/story/sports/nfl/lions/2015/10/29/pontiac-silverdome-memories/74835284/ I don't see any reason for those numbers to have been inflated, so it looks like it's surely possible for that many people to be in the Silverdome. If the number is inflated, I don't think it's inflated much. Maybe to get it over the 90,000 mark if it was close, say if it was in the 89,000 range. They might not have all been 'paid', but they were still there. Still doing some research, not sure if I want to give this place my card info to sign up for a free trial, but the parts of this article you can read show the attendance for the Pope was less than expected. https://www.newspapers.com/newspage/99914238/

Do we know for sure that the Pope wouldnt work his numbers?
I feel like no one knows anything for sure anymore. I guess I don't see a reason because as far as I know he's not in competition with anyone, but I don't know.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

this was so papered that as 72,000 drawing card only drew 1.5 million usd adjust for inflation around 4.5 Mlioon this did not i compre this the inoki retirement show that drew 8.5 mliioon gate at the time and around 12.25 adjusted for inflation

 

if ot ud draw 92,000 that gate is even more of an embasstsament since that means as show that drew almost 30 k less fans drew 3x the gate lol the inoki show is officially the 5th biggest gate in the History of wrestling only topped by four mainas III not included

Yep, Mania 3 was a total flop. Why do we even care 30 years later. Close the thread

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

this was so papered that as 72,000 drawing card only drew 1.5 million usd adjust for inflation around 4.5 Mlioon this did not i compre this the inoki retirement show that drew 8.5 mliioon gate at the time and around 12.25 adjusted for inflation

 

if ot ud draw 92,000 that gate is even more of an embasstsament since that means as show that drew almost 30 k less fans drew 3x the gate lol the inoki show is officially the 5th biggest gate in the History of wrestling only topped by four mainas III not included

Yep, Mania 3 was a total flop. Why do we even care 30 years later. Close the thread

 

wow way to jump to the wrong concsion of what i said i cav call you a troll for this comment

 

the way the wwe hype it up as the biggest of all time when his not even there own the biggest show

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's more than just cold numbers that make it the biggest show of all time. Hogan vs Andre is mythical and so is Savage vs Steamer to a lesser extent. It's more legend than wrestling show

this topic is about cold numbers im not usassly about cold numbers myself but this topic is about cold numbers so quote Cold numbers that i know

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Supposedly on September 18, 1987 for Mass with Pope John Paul II the attendance was over 90,000 as well not long after Wrestlemania 3 according to this Detroit Free Press article too. https://www.freep.com/story/sports/nfl/lions/2015/10/29/pontiac-silverdome-memories/74835284/ I don't see any reason for those numbers to have been inflated, so it looks like it's surely possible for that many people to be in the Silverdome. If the number is inflated, I don't think it's inflated much. Maybe to get it over the 90,000 mark if it was close, say if it was in the 89,000 range. They might not have all been 'paid', but they were still there. Still doing some research, not sure if I want to give this place my card info to sign up for a free trial, but the parts of this article you can read show the attendance for the Pope was less than expected. https://www.newspapers.com/newspage/99914238/

Do we know for sure that the Pope wouldnt work his numbers?

 

I think Dave has said that he heard the PR people involved with the Pope's appearance worked his numbers solely so they could say they beat the Wrestlemania III number.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

 

Supposedly on September 18, 1987 for Mass with Pope John Paul II the attendance was over 90,000 as well not long after Wrestlemania 3 according to this Detroit Free Press article too. https://www.freep.com/story/sports/nfl/lions/2015/10/29/pontiac-silverdome-memories/74835284/ I don't see any reason for those numbers to have been inflated, so it looks like it's surely possible for that many people to be in the Silverdome. If the number is inflated, I don't think it's inflated much. Maybe to get it over the 90,000 mark if it was close, say if it was in the 89,000 range. They might not have all been 'paid', but they were still there. Still doing some research, not sure if I want to give this place my card info to sign up for a free trial, but the parts of this article you can read show the attendance for the Pope was less than expected. https://www.newspapers.com/newspage/99914238/

Do we know for sure that the Pope wouldnt work his numbers?

I think Dave has said that he heard the PR people involved with the Pope's appearance worked his numbers solely so they could say they beat the Wrestlemania III number.
In addition to what Pete said, I've never seen anything suggesting that the Vatican ever put out a number. Hell, there was never an official number until the Silverdome pulled one (seemingly) out of thin air 15 years later.

 

It's entirely possible that that's were more people at the mass, but the photos make it look like that had a bigger stage. Regardless, it's very obvious, both from photos and the Secret Service scouting WM3 to prepare the Pope's security plan, that both events were set up for similar capacities. The claim in the past that 88k for the Pope was the "real" counterpart to 78k for WM3 doesn't appear to have any basis in reality. Just like the report that the Silverdome website had some variation of the "real" numbers for "years" when it was, at best, 4 weeks (but more likely never happened).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fascinating how everyone's instinct, both here and on Twitter, is to just write their own opinions on the number, citing almost no sources. No one mentioned the simple fact that this is a fantastically researched article, as usual Bix. I really enjoyed exploring the external links you provided. Good stuff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fascinating how everyone's instinct, both here and on Twitter, is to just write their own opinions on the number, citing almost no sources. No one mentioned the simple fact that this is a fantastically researched article, as usual Bix. I really enjoyed exploring the external links you provided. Good stuff.

I second this. Bix posted it here to kickstart opinion and debate, but by itself it's a good article on it's own. Well done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...