WashingtonFB

Roman and AJ need to be on the same show. Preferably Smackdown.

Sasha and Charlotte are really two the best female wrestlers the company has ever had.

The top talent on Smackdown is also better.

I don't get the appeal

Can't remember the last time WWE had weekly TV this consistently entertaining.

The absurdity of this.

I don't get how anyone can defend Meltzer here, but i'm certainly not surprised people are attempting to.

Doesn't really seem out of character or unprofessional.

So you guys would say AJ is a better worker than Danielson?

This is WWE's show of the year. Bizarre stuff.

That's every WWE main eventer.

I don't get it.. I've seen plenty of bad main event matches from the company this past year. The style isn't really as conducive to great matches as you are making it seem.

Triple H has proven to be irreplaceable simply because he won't let anyone replace him.

the HHH/Shane separation probably has more to do with building an angle for Mania than any perceived heat.

Really ? The whole, and only, argument for Roman Reigns is "he has all the best matches in the company". So yeah, really, the only thing is that people don't agree about the greatness of matches, but this is pretty much the only argument. The fact that Reigns is not a good promo, that his character has been pushed as Cena N°2 etc doesn't seem do be taken in account in why he's being rejected. The whole argument is "Stupid indy-loving WWE crowd, Roman is da great wrestler". Ok. So, it's only a matter of chosing your own "greatest wrestler who has all the greatest matches". They just disagree on the matches. In essence, this is good old smart fan, snowflake loving argument. That's why it's kinda funny to me. (about Roman Reigns being a great worker or not, I don't really care, or even really don't, but I was more interested in him vs Rusev than any other match at SS. Well, because of Rusev, but still, I was curious to see the match, as opposed to the other main events) Where are the great characters in this company?